Drowning in Climate Disaster News? Understanding Eco-Anxiety Through a New Lens
Caught between climate despair and denial? There's another way.
Discover why climate news feels more overwhelming than in past generations
Uncover the hidden forces shaping our emotional responses to climate change
Gain a new perspective that avoids both burnout and apathy
Learn how choosing hope can be a radical act of resistance in the face of manufactured despair
Hurricane News Has Me Torn Between Burnout and Tune-out
"Neither burning out nor tuning out is viable, especially when the stakes are so high and the impacts so unevenly distributed."
As Hurricane Helene transformed "climate safe havens" into deadly flood zones and record-setting Hurricane Milton battered Florida, I found myself at a familiar emotional crossroads. Do I obsessively track every urgent update, letting anxiety flood my mind, or do I shut it all out, building mental seawalls against the distress? Burn out or tune out - these often feel like the only options in a world where climate disasters are becoming the norm, not the exception.
For me, eco-anxiety manifests as the pit in my stomach when I watch footage of yet another "once-in-a-lifetime" storm or the creeping dread accompanying each new report on accelerating climate change—all while fossil fuel companies continue to post record profits. The weight of this knowledge is crushing, yet paradoxically, I often feel guilty for not knowing more, for not doing more.
Despite decades of environmental involvement, from trekking across remote and wild regions of the Americas to crafting climate change mitigation strategies for the US health care sector, I find myself overwhelmed by the relentless accumulation of anxiety-inducing headlines and events. If I'm struggling, it's no wonder that 27% of Americans report feeling "very worried" about climate change - a number that is steadily increasing.
This widespread anxiety isn't just a personal mental health issue—it's a rational response to a manufactured crisis. The same industries driving climate change also fuel our distress, individualizing a collective problem while sowing doubt about potential solutions. They've mastered a cruel irony: making us simultaneously more dependent on expert knowledge and more distrustful of it. By framing climate anxiety as a private struggle, they obscure their role in creating it. To truly understand and address our shared anguish, we need to recognize it as a deliberate byproduct of a system that profits from both our planet's destruction and our psychological turmoil.
We need a new way to understand our relationship with climate change and the anxiety it provokes. Neither burning out nor tuning out is viable, especially when the stakes are so high and the impacts so unevenly distributed.
Instead, we need to zoom out—to step back and examine the broader context of climate anxiety. By understanding why disaster headlines hit us so hard, we might find a path towards meaningful action rather than paralysis. Let's explore one framework that can help us make sense of our distress and potentially transform our approach to climate change.
Zooming Out: From Hazards to Manufactured Risks
“The relentless pursuit of what is sold to us as “progress” has manufactured enormous wealth for a few, while creating unprecedented risks for all—a global gamble where the profits are hoarded, but the consequences are universally imposed.”
Hurricanes, floods, wildfires - humanity has faced these threats for millennia. So why do today's disaster headlines feel so intense, leaving us reeling with anxiety and dread? The answer lies not just in the events themselves, but in a fundamental shift in our collective relationship with risk.
To understand this shift, we need to examine what German sociologist Ulrich Beck termed "risk society" in the 1980s. Beck distinguished between "hazards" and "risks." In pre-industrial and early modern societies, people faced hazards: natural disasters, crop failures, diseases. These were seen as external threats, often attributed to fate or spirits. But in our current era, we've entered a new phase where many threats we face are manufactured risks—byproducts of our own progress and modernization, often fueled by profit motives with little regard for long-term consequences.
Coastal living has always had its risks, but today's climate threats are rewriting the rulebook. Now, we're facing a human-induced crisis that's turning 'once-in-a-century' events into regular visitors. The greenhouse gases fueling this crisis, largely produced by a handful of corporate giants, are a global phenomenon with localized impacts, often hitting hardest in areas least responsible for their production. The relentless pursuit of what is sold to us as “progress” has manufactured enormous wealth for a few, while creating unprecedented risks for all—a global gamble where the profits are hoarded, but the consequences are universally imposed.
I vividly recall encountering Beck's concept during my graduate studies. It was a powerful moment of "zooming out," suddenly illuminating connections between seemingly unrelated issues—from climate change to global wealth inequalities to rising mental health problems. This new perspective helped me grasp why these issues felt so overwhelming, revealing them as byproducts of cumulative policy decisions and investments typically hyped as "progress."
This risk society framework doesn't just help us make sense of our anxiety—it also reveals the power structures and decision-making processes that have led us to this point. As we delve deeper into its key aspects, we'll see how it shapes our experience of climate change and fuels our anxiety, often in ways that intentionally obscure power dynamics and perpetuate injustice.
Unpacking Risk Society: Deep Dive on Five Key Aspects Shaping Our Climate Anxiety
“We're made to feel personally responsible for solving an issue with systemic causes, creating a constant sense of inadequacy.”
To truly understand how risk society shapes our experience of climate change and fuels our anxiety, we need to dive deeper into some of its key aspects. Each of these elements contributes to the unique psychological landscape we navigate in our climate-changed world, often in ways that obscure power dynamics and perpetuate injustice.
1. Individualization of Risk: The Illusion of Personal Responsibility
In risk society, global problems are increasingly framed as matters of individual choice and responsibility. This passing of the buck unfairly places the burden of managing large-scale risks on individuals, often obscuring the role of institutions and systems that profit from environmental destruction.
Climate Change Example: Consider the ubiquitous advice to reduce your personal carbon footprint. While individual actions like using reusable bags or taking shorter showers are positive, they deflect attention from the real culprits. Just 78 corporate and state entities are responsible for over 70% of global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and cement production since 1751, yet the onus of solving this is often framed as being squarely on the shoulders of individual consumers who are told to reduce their carbon footprints.
Impact on Climate Anxiety: This individualization breeds guilt and anxiety. We're made to feel personally responsible for solving an issue with systemic causes, creating a constant sense of inadequacy. Every plastic straw or long shower becomes a source of shame, adding to our mental burden, while corporate polluters largely escape scrutiny.
Moreover, this misdirection of responsibility can create toxic dynamics within activist circles and community organizations. Feeling powerless in the face of slow systemic change, individuals may project their frustrations onto peers, criticizing others for perceived failures in personal habits. This can lead to infighting, the creation of impossible purity tests, and ultimately, the fracturing of movements that should be united.
2. Manufactured Risks: The Unintended Consequences of Progress
Unlike natural hazards, manufactured risks are human-created byproducts of modernization and technological progress, often driven by profit motives with little regard for long-term consequences. They're typically invisible (you can’t see greenhouse gases), global in scale, and have long-term impacts that are difficult to predict or control.
Climate Change Example: The greenhouse effect perfectly illustrates this. The very technologies that propelled modern development—fossil fuel-powered industries, transportation, and energy production—have altered the Earth's atmosphere on a global scale. Yet, despite decades of scientific warnings, these industries continue to prioritize short-term profits over planetary health.
Impact on Climate Anxiety: The realization that our modern comforts are directly linked to climate threats creates a profound cognitive dissonance. We're anxious not just about external threats, but about our own complicity in a system that prioritizes economic growth over ecological stability, leading to a deep-seated unease with modern life itself.
3. Constant Uncertainty: Navigating a Sea of Conflicting Information
In risk society, we're continually confronted with competing claims about risks, their severity, and how to address them. This creates a state of perpetual uncertainty and contestation, often manipulated by those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo.
Climate Change Example: Despite overwhelming scientific consensus on human-caused climate change, public discourse is often muddied by manipulative climate science denialism. Building upon a playbook of deception pioneered by the tobacco and lead paint industries; fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists (along with the politicians they own) now carry on this tradition, sowing doubt about climate change science to protect their power and profits. A stark example of this manipulation is Florida Governor DeSantis’ recent law erasing climate change from state statutes, even as the state faces record heat and intensifying hurricanes.
Impact on Climate Anxiety: This manufactured uncertainty intentionally erodes our sense of stability and security. In an almost Orwellian twist, the very language we need to discuss climate change is being subtly reshaped or erased from public discourse, making it harder to even articulate our concerns. We're left questioning which information sources to trust and how to plan for a future that feels increasingly unpredictable, fueling anxiety and decision paralysis. This engineered confusion not only exacerbates our climate anxiety but also benefits those who profit from inaction, allowing them to continue business as usual while we struggle to find words for our growing unease.
4. Knowledge Dependency and Erosion of Trust: The Expert Paradox
As risks become more complex and technical, we become increasingly dependent on expert knowledge to understand and navigate them. Simultaneously, trust in institutions and expertise is eroding, often due to deliberate campaigns of misinformation.
Climate Change Example: Understanding climate science requires specialized knowledge most of us don't possess. We rely on scientists, journalists, and policymakers to interpret and communicate climate risks. Yet, incidents like "Climategate" or politically motivated attacks on climate science have eroded public trust in these sources, often serving the interests of those who benefit from climate inaction.
Impact on Climate Anxiety: This creates a troubling paradox. We're more dependent than ever on expert knowledge to understand climate risks, yet less trusting of the sources of that knowledge. This leaves us feeling vulnerable and ill-equipped to gauge the true nature of the threats we face, exacerbating our anxiety and making collective action more difficult.
5. Global Nature of Risks: The Paradox of Over-responsibility and Powerlessness
Risks in modern society, especially climate risks, transcend national boundaries. They're global in nature, challenging traditional notions of governance and responsibility, and often exacerbating existing global inequalities.
Climate Change Example: A ton of CO2 emitted in New York has roughly the same impact on the planet’s climate as a ton emitted in New Delhi. Yet, the consequences of climate change are unevenly distributed, often affecting most severely those who contributed least to the problem and have the fewest resources to adapt.
Impact on Climate Anxiety: The global nature of climate risk can make us feel simultaneously over-responsible and powerless. We're aware that our actions have global consequences, yet also that individual or even national-level actions seem insufficient to address a truly global problem. This global-local tension becomes a constant source of stress and anxiety, particularly as we witness the disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities worldwide.
How Risk Society Aspects Interact to Amplify Anxiety
These five aspects of risk society don't exist in isolation—they interact and reinforce each other, creating anxiety-elevating synergies that can feel overwhelming. For instance, the individualization of risk combines with knowledge dependency to create a perfect storm of anxiety: we are encouraged to feel personally responsible for a crisis we can barely understand. The constant uncertainty amplifies our sense of manufactured risks, making every decision feel like a potential misstep. Meanwhile, the global nature of climate risks makes us acutely aware of our interconnectedness, yet the erosion of trust in institutions leaves us feeling ill-equipped to address these planetary-scale challenges collectively.
This interplay of factors can create a paralyzing feedback loop: the more we learn about the complex, systemic nature of climate change, the more overwhelming our individual responsibility feels, further fueling our anxiety and often leading to disengagement—the very opposite of what's needed to address this crisis. Recognizing these synergies is crucial, as it underscores the need for systemic solutions that address not just the environmental aspects of climate change, but also the social and psychological landscapes that shape our responses to it.
Understanding these five aspects of risk society reveals our anxious tendency to burn out or tune out as more than a personal response—it's a product of cumulative complex, systemic risks, often intentionally stoked by those profiting from inaction. By recognizing these broader forces, including tactics that amplify individual guilt while obscuring corporate responsibility, we can reframe our anxiety. It's not a personal failing, but a reasonable, and often manipulated, reaction to unprecedented challenges. This understanding is crucial as we consider how to navigate our climate-changed world more effectively.
Conclusion: A New Lens for Our Climate Reality
“When hopelessness is fabricated and promoted by those who profit from inaction, choosing hope becomes a radical act of resistance and rebellion.”
As we zoom back in from our broader perspective on risk society, our understanding of climate anxiety is more nuanced and contextualized. The overwhelming force of disaster headlines now appears not as a string of isolated phenomena, but as a symptom of larger systemic forces at play - and an outcome that is at least partly manufactured through manipulate tactics that protect the status quo.
Watching the latest updates on Hurricane Milton's aftermath, I find this zooming out tactic helps. The devastation is no less heart-wrenching, but my perspective has shifted. Instead of feeling paralyzed by anxiety or compelled to post "thoughts and prayers" on social media, I find myself engaging with the news more critically and reaching out to friends and colleagues to spark nuanced discussions.
We delve into the systemic factors at play: how climate change, driven by profit-seeking entities, intensifies these storms; how the individualization of risk shifts responsibility from corporations to citizens; and how the deliberately fueled erosion of trust in institutions serves those who benefit from inaction. We discuss how climate anxiety itself is manufactured, often obscuring that a handful of actors are responsible for the majority of emissions.
This new perspective helps us connect climate change to other risk society anxieties – from the potential long-term health impacts of ubiquitous microplastics to the unintended health effects of industrial chemicals in our food and water. We see how many of our concerns share a common thread: they're the downplayed byproducts of so-called progress. This lens illuminates the broader landscape of manufactured risks defining our era, revealing how the same systems generating these risks also shape our emotional responses to them.
Understanding our anxiety as a product of risk society, rather than a personal failing, has been liberating. It's freed me from the twin perils of burning out or tuning out and opened paths for critical engagement. I don't need therapy; I need a sharper critical consciousness and spaces for constructive dialogue to make sense of our shared predicament. When I now encounter climate news, I find myself asking different questions: Who benefits from framing this issue this way? How does this connect to other manufactured risk challenges we face? Who profits if I burn out or tune out? How can I talk about this new perspective with others? This shift in perspective is the first step towards informed, collective action.
In a risk society where even our emotional responses are subject to manipulation, we must recognize that hopelessness itself can be a form of manufactured oppression. Just as we resist narratives that individualize systemic problems, we must also push back against engineered despair. When hopelessness is fabricated and promoted by those who profit from inaction, choosing hope becomes a radical act of resistance and rebellion. This isn't blind optimism, but a hope born of critical understanding and collective consciousness—a choice to engage rather than despair. It's a declaration that we see through the manufactured risks and anxieties, and we choose to act anyway.
This is the point where aspiring blog writers are encouraged to boil down the takeaway points and pose a “call to action” for readers. I’m resisting that advice. I trust my readers to draw their own conclusions without needing me to spoon feed coping tips to them. A major point of my blogging experiment is to stimulate conversation, reflection, and critical thinking by raising consciousness about Big Ideas that help us make sense of the systemic roots of our personal troubles.
As you reflect on what we've explored, I invite you to consider: How might this risk society framework change your own relationship with climate change news? In what ways could it reshape your understanding of other modern risks you encounter? How could you share it with others? There's no need for immediate answers or actions. Instead, I encourage you to sit with these ideas, to let them percolate as you engage with climate change headlines.
We may still feel the weight of our climate reality, but now we're equipped with a new lens for understanding it. My hope is that this perspective offers you, as it has for me, a way to navigate our climate-changed world with greater clarity and purpose – not by ignoring our anxiety, but by contextualizing it within the broader systems that shape our lives.
I will continue probing the broader contextual and systemic sources of contemporary anxieties in future posts. I’d love to hear your thoughts and reactions as these help shape future posts and the collection of larger frameworks I choose to explore.
Links and Resources
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity by Ulrich Beck. The original book that launched this new perspective.
The rise of eco-anxiety: scientists wake up to the mental-health toll of climate change. “Researchers want to unpick how climate change affects mental health around the world — from lives that are disrupted by catastrophic weather to people who are anxious about the future.” By Helen Pearson
Yale Experts Explain Climate Anxiety “Every day, the news delivers fresh images and headlines about climate-related disasters — devastating floods, disappearing lakes, a melting ‘doomsday glacier’—and the halting response of world leaders to act with urgency. It’s no surprise that many Americans are growing increasingly anxious about the perilous state of our planet.”
What to do About Eco-Anxiety | Jay Michaelson on the ‘10% Happier with Dan Harris’ podcast episode. “In the mental health community, there’s a new term: “Eco-Anxiety.” Our guest in this episode, Jay Michaelson, has been thinking hard about climate change for many, many years. Michaelson is a meditation teacher, rabbi, lawyer, activist, and journalist. And he is also a core teacher in the Ten Percent Happier app. He’s covered climate change extensively, and has taught environmental ethics at Boston University Law School and Chicago Theological Seminary. He has also been a leading environmental activist in religious communities.”
Climate & Mind: “Exploring climate breakdown, human behavior, and human experience: Climate Anxiety, Climate Depression, Climate Grief and Climate Mental Health.”
A sociology of anxiety: Western modern legacy and the Covid-19 outbreak by Paola Rebughini. “Anxiety is the inseparable companion of uncertainty; and the focus on uncertainty has especially characterized the economic processes of globalization of recent decades. Anxiety is not only an individual emotional state related to everyday life situations; it is also the distinctive emotional feature of a globalization fostered mainly under the influence of Western ideas of uncertainty and risk.”
Great post. Thank you.
I've read this essay several times now, it's so incredibly rich, thank you. I've also shared this in my 'Work That Reconnects' training group, as it's such a powerful unpacking of the psychological numbness and confusion that so many of us are grappling with. I found the unpacking of 'complicity' incredibly helpful, and how this can lead to petty infighting instead of collective action really insightful. "Every plastic straw or long shower become a source of shame" - and shame is an emotion that motivates us to examine our behaviour... and yet even if we were able to live our lives without plastic straws or showers, it's still not going to make a difference... And then, how this cognitive dissonance and powerlessness muddies the water... And prevents us from coming together coherently and addressing the systemic factors at play. This is the kind of critical engagement we need, thank you.