6 Comments
User's avatar
shelspenc's avatar

I don’t like this. The concept is helpful - two people having a conversation. But I would prefer that any Ai content is acknowledged as such within its piece. The speakers should give the same disclaimer that you did. Ai is not something we want to get more comfortable with.

Expand full comment
Tom Colucci's avatar

Paul. All of this makes sense. I am experiencing much of it. Thank You! I am beginning to see the value in being strategic! This is

a marathon, not a sprint. I will keep reading, listening, and interacting here. Thank You! 😊

Expand full comment
Paul T Shattuck, MSW, PhD's avatar

Thank you, Tom 🙏🏻☮️

Expand full comment
Rachel Villarreal's avatar

Interesting. For me, the voices were too upbeat and spoke too quickly to portray a conversation requiring such thought about a new framework. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Such great advice. Even the article headlines make me pause and reset my sense of optimism.

Expand full comment
Ruth's avatar

Well, this was the first time that I think I listened to two AI "persons" talking about a subject. I was struck first by the male voice that sounded eerily like Dax Shepherd from the podcast Armchair Expert! His voice was so real sounding and he paused in all the right places. But the female voice to me seemed more rushed and I had a hard time letting all the content soak in. I will be interested in knowing what others thought. I think I learn better by reading but I am happy to keep trying this just for the new experience. I think I was too preoccupied by the format this time that I didn't absorb as much as I'd like. Also, they kept saying The Source, The Source.... I found that distracting. Thanks for trying new ways to make your good work more accessable.

Expand full comment